Due to this, they propose that much of it can be effectively removed from the blocks. Researchers at the University of Bristol demonstrated that a large amount of the radioactive 14C was concentrated on the inner walls of the graphite blocks. When the graphite blocks are removed during station decommissioning, their induced radioactivity qualifies them as low-level waste requiring safe disposal. During their use, some of the non-radioactive carbon-12 and carbon-13 isotopes in graphite get converted into radioactive 14C by capturing neutrons. These blocks act as a neutron moderator whose purpose is to slow down fast-moving neutrons so that nuclear chain reactions can occur with thermal neutrons. In graphite-moderated reactors, fissile uranium rods are placed inside graphite blocks. This can be restated in terms of band theory by saying that due to the high energy of the beta particles, electrons in the carbon valence band jump to its conduction band, leaving behind holes in the valence band where electrons were earlier present. These beta particles, having an average energy of 50 keV, undergo inelastic collisions with other carbon atoms, thus creating electron-hole pairs which then contribute to an electric current.

ДЎ4C undergoes beta decay, in which it emits a low-energy beta particle to become Nitrogen-14, which is stable (not radioactive). Researchers are trying to improve the efficiency and are focusing on use of radioactive 14C, which is a minor contributor to the radioactivity of nuclear waste. This research was published in April of 2018 in the Diamond and Related Materials journal. At those values, its energy density would be approximately 3.3 Wh/g over its 100 year half-life, about 10 times that of conventional electrochemical batteries. It produced a power output of about 1 ОјW at for power density of 10 ОјW/cm 3. In 2018, researchers from the Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology (MIPT), the Technological Institute for Superhard and Novel Carbon Materials (TISNCM), and the National University of Science and Technology (MISIS) announced a prototype using 2-micron thick layers of 63Ni foil sandwiched between 200 10-micron diamond converters. Prototype nuclear battery, Technological Institute for Superhard and Novel Carbon Materials. Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology prototype External image Then they proceed to claim it is not possible to replace an AA battery with this technology, which should be aimed at applications where a low discharge rate over a long period of time is required, such as microelectronics, space exploration, medical devices, seabed communications, etc.

ДЇrom their FAQ, the estimated power of a C-14 cell is 15J/day for thousands of years, which they compare to an AA battery weighing 20g, and providing 700J/g.

Contradicting other details and figures for performance exceed theoretical values by several orders of magnitude. Details about the performance of this prototype have been provided. In 2016, researchers from the University of Bristol claimed to have constructed one of those 63Ni prototypes.

1.2 Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology prototypeД¬urrently no known prototype uses 14C as its source, there are however some prototypes that use nickel-63 ( 63Ni) as their source with diamond semiconductors for energy conversion which are seen as a stepping stone to a possible 14C diamond battery prototype.

Nuke 10 beta